01 / CODEX × POWERPOINT · 2026-09-09
Complex slides. Built, revised, reused.
Explore eight public example slides covering case research and three operating models, with separate diagrams, images and text that support targeted edits.
Case research. Complex diagrams. Three-column operating models.
Rebuilding layouts every time a table, chart or explanation changes
Revise the requested objects within the same slide
EDITABLE STRUCTURE. ANONYMIZED EXAMPLES.
Complex diagrams, built from editable objects.
Eight public examples based on the structure of real work. Organization, university, location and project identifiers have been generalized. Explore each diagram alongside its illustrated explanation, and select a slide to enlarge it.
A public adaptation preserving the working PPT structure while changing identifying text, logos and details within images. Counts refer to individual objects in the public PPT; elements within pictures remain images. The A/B downloads below are separate editing examples.
REAL STRUCTURE. VISIBLE REVISIONS.
The same slide, revised.
Compare changes to the table, chart and text. This public example retains the work’s structure, with example names and values.
“Change employment growth from 800 to 1,200 and cultural space to 15,000m². Update the table and chart together, and thicken the bars.”
Historical Codex revisions: bar heights, outside labels, change rates, table units and change columns. A/B is a new public example of that editing workflow.
LOOK CLOSER AT THE EVIDENCE
Explore the evidence in detail.
FROM REQUEST TO RESULT
How did we make it work?
- 01
Set the brief
Set the brief for the research, case studies and operating models.
- 02
Build native objects
Build comparisons, process diagrams, pictures and explanations as separate objects.
- 03
Revise the details
Adjust bar heights, labels, change rates and table structure.
- 04
Reuse the structure
Inspect the public example and its revised version using the same structure.
COULD THIS WORK FOR YOU?
Could this work in your setup?
Which parts of this PPT can I edit, and how can I reuse its design?
THE EVIDENCE & LIMITS
Explore the records
01What the eight public slides show
Two case-research slides and six slides on three operating models have been adapted for public viewing. Company, university, location and project names, distinctive figures and logos have been generalized.
Public examples 1–2 cover production facilities and AI use; 3–4 cover education, projects and employment; 5–6 cover startup pilots, revenue and investment; 7–8 cover university collaboration and manufacturing AX. Each model pairs a diagram with a three-column illustrated slide.
Identifying text and logos within images have also been edited. The public organizations, programs and figures are generalized and should not be used to identify a specific company or project, or treated as evidence of completed operations.
02Targeted editing within complex diagrams
The PPT workflow separates images, text, shapes and connectors. Native text and shapes can be revised individually in content, size and position.
The website shows rendered slides for easy reading. The working layout is retained while public content is anonymized. Elements inside a picture are not all separate editable PPT objects.
03Revising the same slide through instructions
Retained work records include targeted changes to bar heights, outside labels, percentage changes, table units and change columns. The core workflow preserves the same slide while changing the requested details.
The separate public A/B examples let readers inspect text, shapes, tables and charts. The first slide has 22 text/shape objects, one native chart and a 3×3 table. The second has 29 text/shape objects and four pictures.
04Scope of the public A/B examples
The A/B downloads are separate public examples of the editing workflow. Names and figures are example data; they are not a download of the full eight-slide gallery.
A/B is a new example showing changes to text, values, charts and formatting within the same slide. It is separate from historical before-and-after source files.
05Review and reuse
Claims, evidence, diagrams and explanations are reviewed together. Numbers and assumptions are checked before the relevant objects are revised.
File counts alone do not establish productivity. Drafting time and human review effort need separate measurements, so this introduction makes no numerical time-saving or productivity claim.